> It would be a whole lot nicer to insert> (disable-tests)> and> > (enable-tests)> in the code, or perhaps to wrap a bunch of lines of code in> > (with-tests-disabled ...)> or> (with-tests-enabled ...)
The Tracer does essentially this in reverse: by default you use the Tracer language and "nothing happens" (ie, code runs and produces answers but there's no visible tracing), but you can turn on tracing with: 1.1 (trace-failed-checks) Adding (trace-failed-checks) will trace only failing checks, including failed instances of check-expect, check-within, check-error, check-member-of, and check-range. 1.2 (trace-all) Adding (trace-all) will trace all top level expressions and failed checks. 1.3 (trace-explicit) Adding (trace-explicit) will trace failing checks and any expression wrapped in (trace ...). Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
