On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:58:45 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> > The addition of `stream' makes sense to me. What were the arguments >> > against? >> >> I don't know that any were articulated yet, but what would be the >> difference between 'stream' and 'list'? > > The suggested `stream' is a syntactic form whose subexpressions are > evaluated lazily. > > Although there hasn't been much time for comments, I'll push the > addition for now; we can take `stream' back out if it's a bad idea.
Seems like a good idea to me. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
