On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > Also, it's likely that I don't understand, but it sounds to me like > it's better to stay out of this thing since otherwise you need to > commit to be sandboxed -- and if it's the same as on the ios, then a > sandboxed racket is not very useful...
First, this isn't the same as the iOS sandbox, but it would be troublesome for Racket. For example, I don't think `require' can work. Second, signing doesn't imply sandboxing, I think. Only in the Mac App Store is sandboxing required. I think we will definitely want to make Racket a signed app. Your friendly smug Linux user :), -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
