Yes. I should definitely fix that, whether or not I implemented chunked transfers.
Jay On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:18 PM, John Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > >> There is nothing going wrong with the supported features of the Web >> server. It's just that the Web server doesn't support any >> Transfer-Encoding other than the default of no encoding. > > From RFC2616: > > "A server which receives an entity-body with a transfer-coding it does not > understand SHOULD return 501 (Unimplemented), and close the connection. A > server MUST NOT send transfer-codings to an HTTP/1.0 client. " > > Am I right in thinking that we're falling afoul of this "should", making us a > "conditionally compliant" implementation of HTTP/1.1? > > John > -- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
