30 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> How about `facet', with the terminology that "facets" are
> implemented as "submodules"?
I like using a different term with just that explanation (ie, "a facet
is a particular kind of a submodule").
But I still don't like `facet' -- not only because of my non-native
point, but also because it sounds to me like facets are distinct. (So
it's weird that one facet can require another.)
How about just `slice'? It sounds good on two levels: you split a
module into several slices, and also you split each of this by small
slices of code. You'd read code as
(slice #|of|# main
...)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
