On Mar 12, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote: > The current demodularizer would do that. Presumably we could make a > tool that operated on a single module's zo and removed such > submodules. The main problem would be that the source is > un-compilable.
Meaning? Removing docs and tests shouldn't leave the functional part in bad shape > > Jay > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> Yes, dependencies abound if we include tests and doc in the same module. At >> the same time it is good practice to have things together. >> >> Can't this problem be solved with module-flattening tools? From what I can >> tell, these test and doc modules could be dropped leaving the running >> residual, which could be bundled. > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
