Because it was changed to be based on "#lang racket" instead of the
(old) "#lang mzscheme" not too long ago. I think there was a post here
(or on the users's list) about this, but I'm not sure that this
particular point was mentioned there, so I can see how you'd be

Is this causing you trouble with classes or similar? Would a "#lang
eopl/mzscheme" or something like that be useful for backwards
compatibility? (You'd still need to use that #lang line, tho, since
the regular eopl language is now changed for good.)


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <> wrote:
> How come when building Racket from the latest source of the repository
> (at least as of 3 days ago), #lang eopl doesn't recognize
> (all-defined) as a valid provide spec and wants (all-defined-out)
> instead?
> --- nadeem
> _________________________
>  Racket Developers list:

  Racket Developers list:

Reply via email to