> (define (string-index-of sub str [start 0] [end (string-length str)]) >
I always need to go check the documentation for that kind of argument position (like for (string-replace from str to) ). To me, what makes more sense is to have the str argument on the first position, just like for a method call with a self argument, which makes sense for strings on functions like string-.... Does it bother other people too? Laurent
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
