Just now, Marijn wrote:
>
> Yes, that is indeed what I meant.
>
> I wanted to benefit from being able to use multiple forms as in
> lambda,
The problem is which if the two `begin' features you want -- splicing
of definitions or sequencing side effects...
> but on second thought I guess this would conflict with `begin'
> having a different meaning in macro templates than it does in
> function bodies... I should prolly also rethink whether I didn't
> mean `(let () ...)' in my code...
That would destroy being able to use it for definitions that should be
visible outside of the macro.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
