Yesterday, [email protected] wrote:
>
> 7519b85 Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> 2012-05-13 06:56
> :
> | comment out test that creates a bad dependency
> |
> | The right long-term solution may be a `strip' operation that
> | removes `test' submodules for a distribution.
Maybe a more practical solution is to make `module+' drop its contents
if the module name is `test' unless some parameter is unset? (IOW,
use `module+' as a configuration point for this stripping.) It's true
that the resulting modules would not be executable in DrRacket, but
that would happen anyway with zo-level stripping.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
