Agreed. Deprecate now, remove next+ or next++ release -- Matthias
On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I think we should give people warnings; we cannot just remove stuff. > > Robby > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and >>> make a note to remove it in a year? >> >> That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? >> >> Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell people to >> change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we could put it up on >> github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` it to look like >> mzlib/class100. >> >> Cheers, >> Asumu >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
