On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> But if the goal is to have *much* more mathy functions, then it seems > better to just have a new toplevel collection. Yes. And including some from the Science collection would be a good thing, assuming Doug is okay with it. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
