Three hours ago, Neil Toronto wrote:
> I'm cribbing from the Boost C++ libraries [*] for much of the `math'
> collection. The license is extremely liberal, requiring only that
> the text of the license be included in any source distribution.
>
> What's the protocol for this?
To be compatible with the license we use.
> FWIW, the FSF says Boost libraries and works derived from it can be
> relicensed as LGPL.
That sounds good enough...
> [*] Unfortunately, the `science' collection has a license problem:
> the stated license (LGPL) at the top any of its files can't be the
> actual license if the file was derived from the Gnu Science Library
> (GSL), which is GPL. Most of the files I'm interested in converting
> to Typed Racket are from the GSL.
GPL is a problem.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
