Just now, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 06:48 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > 30 minutes ago, Neil Toronto wrote:
> >> I suppose this means it's a bad time for the initial commits for the
> >> `math' library. :D
> >
> > As long as it's new code, there's no problem.
>
> It's unfinished and undocumented, and lacks serious testing. I'd
> rather it not get into the release in that state. Is that not a
> problem?
What I meant is that in terms of the release there is no issue if it's
all new code since it won't be in. (Releasing it is obviously not a
good idea...)
[But if your main concern is sharing work, then you can just as well
go with a GH fork, and either make a nice single commit when it's
ready, or push your commits in a single batch.]
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
