> ----- Original Message ----- > I agree that these should never be removed. I would not mind if they > were marked in some way as "these are here for legacy reasons. New > code should use XYZ" with specific pointers and helpful advice.
Okay, we will just add the deprecation notices to the documentation (using the same notice that `htdp/image` and `mzlib/class100` use) but otherwise won't touch `mzlib` and `mzscheme`. There are also some libraries that are still in `mzlib` (with pointers from `racket`) such as `unit` and `control`, so we will go ahead and move these to `racket` and leave pointers in `mzlib` (but legacy code should still work) unless anyone has any objections. Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
