Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 07/20/2012 07:44 AM:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Neil Van Dyke<[email protected]> wrote:
Shouldn't everyone try to eat PLaneT brand dog food? (Not subsist off of
Git brand dog treats.)
Whether or not that's the case in general, in 5.2.1 you can do:
(require combinator-parser)
which can't be replicated with a PLaneT package, but can be replicated
with a library set up with `raco link`, so this may be more useful for
existing users of this now-deprecated code.
In the August release, should collection links support PLaneT versions
(whether coming from PLaneT server or PLaneT dev links)? (I don't know
the answer; I don't know the philosophy of how these links are supposed
to fit with PLaneT.)
Regarding the case in general, occasionally it seems to me like there is
a dogfood issue there. Which is why I jump on any additional precedent
for using Git instead of PLaneT -- jump like an alpha Shih Tzu.
Neil
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
