Matthew might be able to shed some light on it. But, I suspect you'd have similar performance regardless of the container used.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Marijn <hk...@gentoo.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 19-07-12 17:08, Doug Williams wrote: >> I think the problem is the time it takes to create 600 buttons in >> this case, not the time needed to switch between the tabs. I'm not >> sure why you are recreating them each refresh. Am I missing >> something? > > This is a cutdown slightly changed testcase for a performance problem > I'm having in a real program. I'm using some tabs that recreate their > contents in my program, because their contents depend on values input > by the user from another tab. In the testcase, imagine that the first > tab is not blank but lets you specify the number of rows and columns > of the table of buttons on tab 2. > > Marijn > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlAJCm0ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2y6yQCfYPX0yMMNNSUdk5J3FoCeHYg9 > Ia4AnRbCOVgH13ZyQN/HbrJXkbTC37a4 > =Shso > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev