On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > I guess we should try this, but I think we should keep it specific to > bytecode loading. That is, I don't think we should try to splice a > .zip-based filesystem into Racket's core filesystem operations.
I would think that something along the lines of how classpaths work in Java would be the right direction -- ie, PLTCOLLECTS could include files (perhaps with a distinguished extension) in addition to directories, and those would be ZIP files whose internal directory structure was treated the way a directory entry directly in PLTCOLLECTS is treated. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
