On Oct 16, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Just now, John Clements wrote: >> >> If this were about changing the name of match-define to >> define/match, I'd have no objection, but the problem is that we now >> have two forms with names that are identical, modulo a stylistic >> choice. > > It's not -- they have two different meanings.
Violent agreement; I'm saying that the *names* are the same (modulo a stylistic choice), not that the meanings are the same. John > > >> It's as though we had a let/values and a values-let; what kind of >> difference in meaning would a user expect to see between these two? > > Exactly. (I'll reply more to Matthias's question.) > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
