There was a thread I saw on 7/30 that suggested we leave things where they are (and that's what I also think we should do).
Robby On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Wasn't there a decision to keep `racket/package' where it is instead > of moving it to `compatibility'? > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
