Correct. On Nov 7, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I don't think so. > > Neither of you appear to have commit c02797b12160651762a769414de06dcca8ba635e. > > That version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click > on one of the examples. > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> In the most recent version (I think), you can simulate Stephen's complaint >> like this: >> -- switch to BSL, make sure buffer is empty >> -- cmd L >> -- click on a #lang line >> -- when the dialog comes up, say yes to adding the #lang line >> Now you're in an inconsistent state. Just run the buffer. >> >> >> On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >>> I think you missed a revision to the dialog. The currently pushed >>> version switches you to the "The Racket Language" when you click on >>> one of the examples. >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stephen Bloch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Clicking on #lang racket brings up a friendly dialog box saying "you're >>>> really supposed to edit the buffer directly... That said, would you like >>>> me to add #lang racket to the definitions window?" Sounds good so far... >>>> but if I say "yes" to accept this reasonable offer, it leaves me in an >>>> illegal state: in a student language with a #lang line. If we're going to >>>> add a #lang line, we should also switch to "The Racket Language" at the >>>> same time. >>>> >>>> Stephen Bloch >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> _________________________ >>>> Racket Developers list: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >>> >>> _________________________ >>> Racket Developers list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
