At Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0700, Neil Toronto wrote: > I looked into fixing this myself, and identified this as a spot to > change. I also saw some JIT-looking stuff for `flexpt' that looked kind > of like it was machine code, so I didn't try to fix it. Does this code > you just changed get compiled during the build and then inlined by the JIT?
In the case of `flexpt', the "inlined" code is just a call to the sch_pow() C function (which is "inline" enough to avoid boxing). _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
