I know it is probably too late for that but can we release this one as 5.3.2 w/o the package system and do so quickly?
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: >> At Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:51:03 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ryan Culpepper <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please tell me if you think that this release is significant enough >>>> that it should be announced on the users list for wider testing. >>> >>> I think the new package system (yay Jay!) is significant enough that >>> it should get wide testing, and that it merits the release number 5.4. >> >> +1 on v5.4. >> >> I'm not sure about wider testing, because I think it will take time to >> build up enough packages to make testing interesting. > > I think some wider testing can still be useful. For example, does > sytem-wide/installation-wide/user-specific package installation work > on all flavors of Windows/Linux/OSX that we support. > > Another issue, which perhaps Jay has more insight into -- are we > planning to move the PNS to racket-lang.org prior to the release? > > Sam > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
