Yeah, I've noticed it'd be nice to have something like that too .... maybe someday. :)
Robby On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Ray Racine <ray.rac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well I switched to dedicated "open in a new tab" which I do like more > overall than 1-1 source file to window. Nothing to compare against but its > PDQ for me. Just counted, have 14 tabs open currently. > > One drawback with tabs is the loss of side-by-side source, where it is > easy in Linux/Unity to left-right align two windows with 1-1 source file > <-> window. One nice thing to have would be able to split the Racket > window vertically where all the tabs take up half the vertical window split > on the left. When you are this vertical split mode, right-clicking tab > shows the tab on the right-side in lieu of raising it to the forefront of > all the other tabs on the left or something like that. > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On 01/06/2013 08:03 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >>> As you (hopefully) noticed, I've spent a bunch of time this release >>> cycle trying to improve drracket's interactivity and I'm at the point >>> now where I could use a little help testing. So, if you have any time to >>> play with the latest from git (or a nightly build after tonight) and >>> notice that certain things you do make drracket more sluggish, can you >>> please let me know? >>> >> >> I haven't noticed extra sluggishness, but I have noticed that switching >> tabs is faster. Since I do that a lot, you have my thanks. :) >> >> Neil ⊥ >> >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev> >> > > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
