Sorry for the false alarm. Although I'm still waiting for the build of latest to finish, on GitHub I discovered I'm missing 2a1f70264c0b0d9528a7802b7e01dbe002db39aa from 6 days ago.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Building as of 3312a806 from Jan 7: > > Welcome to Racket v5.3.2.1. > -> ,log debug > -> (log-debug "hi") > -> ; match: no matching clause for '#(debug "hi" > #<continuation-mark-set> #f) [,bt > ; for context] > > Whereas: > > Welcome to Racket v5.3.1. > -> ,log debug > -> (log-debug "hi") > -> ; [debug] hi #<continuation-mark-set> > > It's re the `match` in this code in xrepl.rkt: > > (when level > (let ([r (make-log-receiver global-logger level)]) > (current-log-receiver-thread > (thread > (λ () > (let loop () > (match (sync r) > [(vector l m v) > (display (format "; [~a] ~a~a\n" > l m (if v (format " ~.s" v) ""))) > (flush-output)]) > (loop)))))))) > > It looks like the log-receiver vector got an extra, 4th element? > > > p.s. I'm doing a fetch of latest, and rebuild as I type this... > > > p.p.s. I have an open pull request to enhance XREPL for the loggers > added in 5.3.1: > > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/188 > > Eli had some concerns about it, and I wasn't expecting it to be merged > for 5.3.2. > > Anyway that's a different matter, from what I'm emailing about now. > AFIK the change with log-receiver sync vector popped up fairly > recently (I think??). _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
