This one seems maybe okay: https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/3e3608ccb82de7e14b0b3aed223d95c7d5a500ba
but the other one definitely seems like too much. And I'm not sure that that one is a good idea. I think it is, but I'd want to try something like that for a while before releasing it. On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Danny Yoo <d...@cs.wpi.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > Do you have a commit in mind? (It would need to a simple one that is > easily > > seen to be "correct".) > > > I'm thinking of the two commits currently on my compiler-hack branch: > > > https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/1caae27ded89a46453316f65ae5cbf7b04a4bd66 > > https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/3e3608ccb82de7e14b0b3aed223d95c7d5a500ba > > to address the immediate problem of the PLanet2 stuff. I hadn't > merged into upstream because I was waiting to hear about the exact > right paths to include in the manager-skip-file-handler in the second > commit, and did not hear consensus. > > > I'm also partial to the gunzip fix in > > http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commit/c6775cc0605dfed29e347f1932adcc11b5e220db > . > I ran across this in the context of broken PLaneT2 package > installation, since PLanet2 defaults to .zip archives. >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
