An hour and a half ago, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2013-02-10 05:57:52 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > Sorry that it has taken me so long to join in and that I overlooked the > > PR way back in September. > > Thanks for the fix! On a related note, should any of the following > interactions work? > > $ racket > Welcome to Racket v5.3.3.1. > -> (enter! (submod scheme/unit compat)) > ; module->namespace: unknown module in the current namespace
There is no such submodule, but (enter! (submod racket/unit compat)) does work, and incidentally, exposes the fact that xrepl doesn't show a submodule path in its prompt, yet. (I'm not sure how it would be shown, btw, using the submod form is very verbose for a prompt.) > -> (module foo racket (define x 3) (module bar racket (define x 5))) > -> (enter! 'foo) > 'foo> (enter! 'bar) > ; module->namespace: unknown module in the current namespace > ; name: #<resolved-module-path:'bar> > ; [,bt for context] > 'foo> (enter! (submod "." bar)) > ; standard-module-name-resolver: no base path for relative submodule path: > ; (submod "." bar) [,bt for context] I'm not sure about these, but IIRC, there was a similar question about doing the same in drr. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev