At Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:59:01 -0500, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote: > 899a327 Matthew Flatt <mfl...@racket-lang.org> 2013-02-26 14:14 > : > | add experimental support for "phaseless" modules > |
After reading the docs, I find the name "phaseless" confusing. IIUC, these modules are not special because they have no phase, but rather because they're the same at all phases. Would "pan-phase", "omni-phase" or "cross-phase" be an accurate description? Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
