At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:35:42 -0600, mikel evins wrote: > The reason I ask is that MacScheme made it easy to have most of an app > compiled to bytecode, which was very compact and reasonably efficient, but to > optionally and selectively compile performance-critical procedures to native > code. [...] > With MacScheme, the choice of bytecode or native code was a compile-time > decision controlled on a per-procedure basis by optimization parameters.
In Racket, all code is compiled to bytecode, and all bytecode is compiled to native code through a JIT compiler. So, hopefully, this will not be an issue at all. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
