-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Mikel,
On 06-03-13 04:05, mikel evins wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> > wrote: >> But looking at it more deeply I certainly lose something -- I >> lose the ability to use source code for development, > > Come again? How does that happen? It has certainly never happened > to me. > >> which could be a real problem for me if I'm working on some code >> with someone remote and all we have to communicate are binary >> images. > > Well, sure, if I were suddenly somehow denied access to sources > and made to communicate with colleagues only through binary images, > that would be a bad thing, but I'm not losing any sleep over the > possibility. Matter of fact, it never occurred to me before this > moment that it could ever be a possibility. So how exactly does source code enter into this way of working where you type code at the REPL and save and load images? Is there a function that translates images to source code? Otherwise, how do you prevent losing your code? From source it is easy to get to an image, right? So what advantage is there to using images over source code for saving, loading and exchange? Or is what you're describing also possible using source code instead of images and then looks something like the ideas of Bret Victor (http://worrydream.com)? Marijn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlE3UXgACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wnVQCgl5T/GUJsfkZLiRH6unP/XJgN JrUAninFo55ZtxvE2iIVgmHc/Mz2RHWo =OMuL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
