On Apr 1, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Bloch <bl...@adelphi.edu> wrote: > > > Also, WeScheme just provides graphics libraries by default, which is > > another option we could consider. > > Bad idea; somebody might want to teach with his/her own version of the > graphics libraries. (I was in this boat before we bundled > picturing-programs.) > > > But picturing-programs didn't have to change the existing image functions, > right? It could either just give a new set or augment the existing set and > still have worked for you? There were a few that I tweaked while keeping the names the same. Stephen Bloch sbl...@adelphi.edu
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
