I'm running into dynamic evaluation behavior that I don't quite
understand yet. My example is:
https://gist.github.com/dyoo/5314045
It's meant as an experiment to see whether it's possible to avoid 3d
syntax in certain places like the gui-debugger. I try to throw in a
wrench on lines 52-54:
https://gist.github.com/dyoo/5314045#file-annotation-example-rkt-L52-L54
but thankfully, when I evaluate this in DrRacket, I get the results I expect.
However, that's when I'm evaluated the annotated+compiled code. If I
modify the example so I'm evaluating just the annotated code, by
modifying lines 117-119
https://gist.github.com/dyoo/5314045#file-annotation-example-rkt-L117-L119
from:
;; But we can evaluate it in ns:
(printf "evaluating the annotated code\n")
(eval compiled-code ns)
to:
;; But we can evaluate it in ns:
(printf "evaluating the annotated code\n")
(eval annotated-code ns)
I get the unexpected shadowing I'm trying to avoid. Why am I getting
the clash here, and not in the compiled code?
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
