Cond's else cannot change. I agree that that's what I would change if I could have it back to do it over, but we cannot.
That's the way to perhaps be thinking about racket2, tho. Robby On Friday, May 3, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > For this kind of thing, my preference would be to change match than to > issue > > a warning. I don't like warnings that are basically admitting weaknesses > in > > the language design.... Of course, changing a core thing like that may be > > more trouble than it is worth, due to backwards compatibility concerns, > > which is why I think it is worth raising here to see what others think. > > I'm happy to make this change to `match`, except that I've heard > Matthew say that he would have used a keyword for `else` in `cond` if > he had it to do over again, and I wouldn't want to change one way, and > then change back. > > Sam >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
