Two.5 notes:
* IMO the sandbox and errortrace should stay in -- even if they're not
needed, they are both intimately tied to the core so there wouldn't
be any benefit from moving them to a package.
* I think that it makes sense to move compatibility into its own
package, and move the mzlib stuff into that same package.
* Maybe the same for data?
9 hours ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> While moving some files around between packages, I realized that there
> are a number of things that could be moved out of the core and into
> packages. Here's a partial list of things that I think are not needed
> at all by the rest of the core:
>
> - racket/sandbox and the rest of the sandbox code
> - data/{union-find, interval-map, splay-tree, skip-list, order, gvector, heap}
> - srfi/4
> - unstable/{options, contract}
> - errortrace (once sandbox is removed)
> - compatibility/*
> - mzlib/{pconvert, class100, serialize, thread, transcr}
> - a bunch of other parts of mzlib that are just reprovides
>
> The following are libraries that could be removed with (I believe)
> small changes to the rest of the core:
>
> - rackunit
> - srfi/13
> - mzlib/unit200 (maybe, this might be hard)
> - mzlib/kw
>
> If this seems like a good idea to people, I'm happy to go ahead and
> start doing the work.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
