On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > One fairly clear thing is that the mzlib manual can move into the > > compatibility-lib. > > I agree. > > > We could move the mzlib-specific files from (the collection) tests/racket > > into a new tests/mzlib and put that into the compatibility-lib. > > > > But that probably requires actual adjustments because tests/racket is > > load-based ... > > > > Probably all of the mzlib-specific tests could be made to run in a #lang > > context without too much trouble, tho. > > I don't feel 100% confident mucking with the tests/racket > infrastructure, and I don't know how worth it this would be. > > BTW, you have some commented-out tests in racket/private/contract that > `(require mzlib/contract)`. > > > I know. Is that a problem? Robby
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
