On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> >>> So, I think option 2 is right for now, and we should eventually spend >>> cycles on really getting `mzscheme' out of the core. >> >> Ok, I'll focus on that. > > I'm mostly done with this now. Progress in this pull request: > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/377
This is now done and tested, and I'd appreciate review. There were two test failures: one in `sandbox.rktl`, and one in `cm.rktl`, but neither seems to be related to my changes. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
