On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> >> At Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> > On Jul 2, 2013 12:42 PM, "Matthew Flatt" <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> > > >> > > I'm pretty sure that "racket-test" needs to be split up. (For the >> > > initial cut, I just put the whole "tests" collection there.) >> > >> > Sorry, I should have been more specific; 'tests/racket/stx.rktl' depends >> > on >> > htdp. I expect that the tests in that directory depend on other >> > packages >> > as well, such as sandbox and compiler. >> >> Depending on "sandbox" and "compiler" seems ok, while the tests that >> depend on "htdp" can be changed to use different modules. > > > Or maybe, if they are actually testing htdp, move into the htdp pkg.
The tests I was looking were testing the syntax system, so I've modified them. > But another issue we're forgetting here is that many of the tests are not in > "#lang" but are load-based. Right, those tests can't be compiled. There are lots of tests in `racket-test` (for, eg, json and pkg and xml) that are thankfully not load-based, so we should decide what to do with them. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
