This sounds like a job for the zero-values define-syntaxes trick,
documented here:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/syntax-model.html#%28part._macro-introduced-bindings%29
Ryan
On 07/10/2013 03:40 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I'm having trouble with some of the features of define-generics in
top-level contexts. Specifically, if I generate any names with
generate-temporaries, and there are forward references to them in the
expanded code, then the forward reference fails to expand because #%top
is not bound in the context of the temporary name. This problem doesn't
come up in module or lexical bindings because all the definitions are
bound, not using #%top, by the time the forward reference is expanded.
So are generate-temporaries identifiers simply dangerous to use for
anything that might wind up at the top level? Or is there a smarter way
to use them that I'm missing?
Carl Eastlund
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
