At Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:12:26 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:43:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt > <mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org> said: > > Matthew> The documentation directory and collection directory should be > Matthew> configurable, now. > > Looks like but I still have problems with the build process as directory > contents are not copied to the destinations.
The "share", "doc", and "etc" directories will be empty/missing for a core build, so that's as expected. (But "config" vs. "etc" was a bug that now should be fixed.) > Matthew> The label on the "Source" snapshots really should say something > Matthew> like "kernel in source form, plus pre-built packages and > Matthew> documentation". The "Minimal Racket" variant doesn't have any > Matthew> packages, but it has the core collections pre-built, and > Matthew> installing a package from the main distribution gets the package > Matthew> in pre-built form from the snapshot site. > > Sorry my understanding from a source package is just source nothing built or > pre-compiled interim product. So source = text files + icons. Yours don't > count as source for me. Yes, I can understand why they may not be what you want. They're intended for users who want a complete install that's as fast as possible on a platform where no pre-built executables are already available. > That also means in the future I would expect a source only package to be > available just like it is currently for the 5.3.5 release. Well, assembling a set of package sources is a kind of interim product --- as long as the assembled set is non-empty, and especially if it's something analogous to v5.3.5. But I think I understand what you mean, and we're just a couple of steps away, now. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev