It sounds fine to me to change the docs. At Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:00:03 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any reason for the documented contract on `alarm-evt` to > specify a non-negative real? The function will happily accept negative > inputs and it seems like that's desirable (if for some reason your > computer clock is set to before 1970 for a good reason). > > Cheers, > Asumu
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
