I like this change; thanks for suggesting it! Robby
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones <to...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > On 07/31/2013 02:24 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > >> I think it often >> makes sense for command-line tools to have weird rules[*], >> > > I agree with you. UIs have to be humane and ergonomic for our weak, > squishy meat-bodies to cope. (Though of course the underlying model has to > be sensible too ;-) ) > > > especially if there's a flag to enable more consistent rules. >> > > Right, to expose a "machine" interface to the raw underlying model. > Porcelain and plumbing. > > > So `--link' could be the default, while `--copy' (?) could disable >> special handling of directory sources? >> > > That sounds fine. I mean, I am unlikely to ever use --copy, but whatever > makes sense to expose in terms of the underlying model. > > Cheers, > Tony > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev> >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
