I removed those options because the implementation did not look sensible for those cases.
Implementation aside, using 'module-begin doesn't make sense to me. A form in the place of `#%module-begin' is always expanded at phase-level 0, so there isn't really. I'm less certain about 'module. It may make sense to use 'module and get the same effect as wrapping the form with `begin-for-syntax', expanding with `local-expand', and removing the expansion again. Do you have an example where you use 'module? At Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:12:16 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote: > Hi, > > Commit e51ac9cc [1] from about a month ago changed the allowed values for > local-transformer-expands context-v argument. It now refuses 'module and > 'module-begin. Previously i could simply pass the result from > syntax-local-context. > I am not sure what i should pass now and what implications the change has. > Any hints appreciated. > > Tobias > > > [1] http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commitdiff/e51ac9cc > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev