On 2013-08-02 18:32:38 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > I'm currently trying to implement contracts for synchronizable events. > During that, I've discovered that there seems to be an undocumented > restriction that `chaperone-evt` can only chaperone an event that is not > a handle event. Here's an example:
I just realized this was supposed to be worded as a question, but I forgot to include the question: is this a fundamental limitation that I should work around in the type/contract system or can it be changed? Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
