The namespace...?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:20 PM, J. Ian Johnson <i...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > I've since changed to using a dynamic-require, but still the memory limit > is not respected. Why wouldn the globals from a dynamic-require be > considered reachable outside the sandbox that calls dynamic-require? > There's no other way to get it. > -Ian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> > To: "David Vanderson" <david.vander...@gmail.com> > Cc: "dev" <dev@racket-lang.org>, "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 2:01:02 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually > bounding memory usage > > Ah, that would probably be the problem. Without having to modify too much > code, would the proper way to call a function entirely within the sandbox > be to use dynamic-require in the thunk, rather than require in the module > using call-with-limits? > -Ian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Vanderson" <david.vander...@gmail.com> > To: "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> > Cc: "dev" <dev@racket-lang.org> > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:50:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually > bounding memory usage > > Just to make sure, is the memory being allocated reachable from outside > the sandbox? > > http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/publications/ismm04-addendum.txt > > On 09/09/2013 01:29 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote: > > I don't use the gui framework at all. This is all just pounding on > global hash-tables and vectors. Or are you talking about the sandbox > queuing up callbacks? > > -Ian > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > > To: "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> > > Cc: "dev" <dev@racket-lang.org> > > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:16:51 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually > bounding memory usage > > > > > > The framework will, sometimes do stuff that queues callbacks and, > depending on how you've set up other things, the code running there might > escape from the limit. Did you try putting the eventspace under the limit > too? > > > > Robby > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:54 AM, J. Ian Johnson < i...@ccs.neu.edu > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm running my analysis benchmarks in the context of (with-limits (* 30 > 60) 2048 <run-analysis>), and it's been good at killing the process when > the run should time out, but now I have an instantiation of the framework > that just gobbles up 15GiB of memory without getting killed. What might be > going on here? > > > > Running 5.90.0.9 > > -Ian > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
