On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> > wrote: >> >> >> On Sep 17, 2013 4:38 AM, "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> >> wrote: >> > >> > FWIW, this seems to have broken the snapshot builds. I'll add the >> > missing dependency declarations so I can restart the northwestern >> > snapshots. >> >> Is this a situation where we can make the builds more robust? Presumably >> this issue wouldn't have prevented the snapshot from working. > > > The snapshots don't currently distinguish between different ways that raco > setup returns a non-zero exit code.
Ah right, now I remember that this is my fault for asking for `raco setup` to exit with a non-zero result in this case. :) > And it isn't like we didn't know that there was a problem. Next time, > probably best to just not commit something that makes raco setup unhappy but > instead discuss it first. Right -- I agree that that would have been better here. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
