On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:31 PM,  <mfl...@racket-lang.org> wrote:
>
> +Constructs a function that is suitable for use as a
> +@racket[#%module-begin] replacement, particularly to replace the
> +facet of @racket[#%module-begin] that wraps each top-level
> +expression to print the expression's result(s).

Should Typed Racket be using this?

Sam
_________________________
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Reply via email to