The 5.92 CSS also doesn't seem to differentiate the different link types
by color or other visual emphasis.
IMHO, this is a step backwards, especially when it comes to visually
distinguishing the three kinds of links: (1) identifier definition; (2)
"tech", and (3) everything else. As I said in an earlier message on the
CSS, overall I think the CSS is an improvement, but the new links
appearances are a poor for reading typical Racket docs with their
plethora of links.
Neil V.
Asumu Takikawa wrote at 01/27/2014 10:54 AM:
BTW, the 5.92 docs are missing some of the recent CSS changes from HEAD.
Could we cherry-pick some of those for 6.0? For example, the blue boxes
don't work here:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/inside/Evaluation.html
[...]
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
