Ok thanks. Sorry, I think one more is missing from curve/c (sect283r1)? Another question: Should BIO_new_mem_buf have an additional "#:wrap (allocator BIO_free)" argument, similar to other allocating functions?
More generally, should BIO_new and BIO_free have #:wrap arguments like the other allocating/deallocating functions? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Edward Lee <e45...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > Those are accidental omissions; I've attached a patch that should fix > the contract and symbol->nid. > > --Edward > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:39:13AM -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: >> I checked out the patch and have a few questions. (I'm a non-expert.) >> >> How come some curves are omitted from the curve/c contract (eg >> sect163k1 and sect193r2)? >> >> Is there also a curve missing from symbol->nid (eg sect571r1)? >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: >> > Edward, your patch sounds OK to me, FWIW. >> > >> > Neil V. >> > >> > >> > _________________________ >> > Racket Developers list: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
