Yes, as it says in the README, it requires a very recent version of Racket. I should add that version requirement to the info file, but I had forgotten the syntax when I was editing the file.
Sam On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Roman Klochkov <kalimeh...@mail.ru> wrote: > And now it is broken in 6.0.1 > >> (require disassemble) > . . ..\..\..\..\Program Files\Racket\collects\ffi\unsafe.rkt:198:2: ffi-obj: > couldn't get "scheme_jit_find_code_end" from #f > > I installed it from pkgs.racket-lang.org > Maybe should be something like #ifdef or depend on another version of Racket > (now it depends upon Racket6.0.0.4) > > Wed, 21 May 2014 19:50:05 -0400 от Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > <sa...@cs.indiana.edu>: > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 05/21/2014 02:09 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >>> >>> Racketeers, >>> >>> Thanks to some improvements from Matthew, my `disassemble` package is >>> now much easier to use. >>> >>> [samth@punge:~/sw/disassemble (master) plt] racket >>> Welcome to Racket v6.0.1.10. >>>> >>>> (require disassemble) >>>> (define (const x) 1) >>>> (disassemble const) >>> >>> 00000000 8943FC mov [ebx-0x4],eax >>> 00000003 83C3FC add ebx,byte -0x4 >>> 00000006 B803000000 mov eax,0x3 >>> 0000000B 83C41C add esp,byte +0x1c >>> 0000000E 5F pop edi >>> 0000000F 5E pop esi >>> 00000010 5B pop ebx >>> 00000011 5D pop ebp >>> 00000012 C3 ret >>>> >>>> >> >> That's crazy awesome. What were the improvements? > > First, Racket now tells you the end of the machine code for a jitted > procedure with `scheme_jit_find_code_end` (so messing about with > guessing the size is no longer needed) and it also can JIT on-demand > (so you don't have to call a function before disassembling it) with > `scheme_jit_now`. > > Sam > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > > -- > Roman Klochkov _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
