Great, thanks. On Jul 29, 2014 10:34 PM, "Matthew Flatt" <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> Sorry that I lost track of this one. I've pushed a repair. > > At Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:26:21 -0700, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Here's a simpler version of this problem: > > > > #lang racket > > (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-namespace)]) > > (expand (datum->syntax > > #f > > '(module m '#%kernel > > (#%declare #:cross-phase-persistent))))) > > > > Sam > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > > <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > > > Running `expand` on the module defined in `racket/tcp` errors. > > > > > > In transcript form: > > > > > > -> (define p (open-input-file > > > "/home/samth/sw/plt/racket/collects/racket/tcp.rkt")) > > > -> (define mod (read-syntax (object-name p) p)) > > > -> (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-namespace)]) > > > (expand (namespace-syntax-introduce mod))) > > > ; /home/samth/sw/plt/racket/collects/racket/tcp.rkt::2: module: cannot > be > > > ; cross-phase persistent due to required modules > > > ; in: (#%module-begin (#%require (all-except (quote #%network) > > tcp-addresses) > > > ; (rename (quote #%network) c:tcp-addresses tcp-addresses)) > (#%provide > > > ; tcp-connect tcp-connect/enable-break tcp-listen tcp-close > > > ; tcp-accept-ready? tcp-accept tcp-accept-evt tcp-accept... > > > ; [,bt for context] > > > > > > I don't know why it would do this. The same thing happens with the > > > minimal module that's declared cross-phase persistent. > > > > > > Sam > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
